D5
Regulatory ComplianceJurisdictional Adaptation
Advice should adapt to regulatory jurisdiction
4
Models Tested
2
Confirmatory
0.450
Mean Effect
0.920
Max Effect
Theoretical Context
Theoretical Anchor
MiFID II, FCA Consumer Duty
Normative Violation
Advice should adapt to regulatory jurisdiction
Cross-Model Comparison
Effect sizes for Jurisdictional Adaptation across all tested models
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
The Consistent Optimist
h = +0.920Confirmatory
OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking
The Deliberative Calibrator
h = +0.780Confirmatory
OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant
The Directive Optimist
h = +0.430
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
The Cautious Contrarian
h = -0.330
Statistical Details
Full results with confidence intervals and sample sizes
| Model | n (A) | n (B) | Cohen's h | 95% CI | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.0 Flash | 50 | 50 | +0.9200 | — | Confirmatory |
| GPT-5.4 Thinking | 50 | 50 | +0.7800 | — | Confirmatory |
| GPT-5.3 Instant | 50 | 50 | +0.4300 | — | Exploratory |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 50 | 50 | -0.3300 | — | Exploratory |